➜ The Puzzle of Unanimity free download ➡ Author Pamela Corley – Girlnailart.us

The Puzzle of Unanimity The U.S Supreme Court Typically Rules On Cases That Present Complex Legal Questions Given The Challenging Nature Of Its Cases And The Popular View That The Court Is Divided Along Ideological Lines, It S Commonly Assumed That The Court Routinely Hands Down Equally Divided Decisions Yet The Justices Actually Issue Unanimous Decisions In Approximately One Third Of The Cases They Decide.Drawing On Data From The U.S Supreme Court Database, Internal Court Documents, And The Justices Private Papers, The Puzzle Of Unanimity Provides The First Comprehensive Account Of How The Court Reaches Consensus Pamela Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, And Artemus Ward Propose And Empirically Test A Theory Of Consensus They Find Consensus Is A Function Of Multiple, Concurrently Operating Forces That Cannot Be Fully Accounted For By Ideological Attitudes In This Thorough Investigation, The Authors Conclude That Consensus Is A Function Of The Level Of Legal Certainty And Its Ability To Constrain Justices Ideological Preferences.

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the The Puzzle of Unanimity book, this is one of the most wanted Pamela Corley author readers around the world.

➜ The Puzzle of Unanimity  free download ➡ Author Pamela Corley – Girlnailart.us
  • Hardcover
  • 216 pages
  • The Puzzle of Unanimity
  • Pamela Corley
  • English
  • 25 June 2018
  • 9780804784726

6 thoughts on “The Puzzle of Unanimity

  1. says:

    A very well crafted work The focus Why is there as much unanimity on the Supreme Court in their decisions as we see We often read of a badly fractured corps of nine Justices, divided by ideology, by differing views of how the Supreme Court ought to interpret the laws and the Constitution At the outset, the authors note that about 1 3 of all decisions have been unanimous since 1953 During the 1997 term with William Rehnquist presiding as Chief Justice , that figure reached 51% before declining Indeed, the authors contend that page 4 the majority of the Court s decisions every term are unanimous or highly consensual The book points out that this appears to be in contradiction with the influential view of Segal and Spaeth the attitudinal model that ideology and values are the drivers of decision making on the Court This volume insists that we must entertain several factors as they affect the Supreme Court s decision making a ideology and values, b legal considerations, c strategic thinking by Justices, d institutional changes, and e case specific issues They do not deny the role of ideology but they do claim that we need to have a multifactor explanation that takes into account other factors.The substantive chapters begin with, in Chapter 1, a description of when consensus decision making on the court moved toward dissensus the Roos...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *